Catchfence


Sep 28, 2009
Monday
It’s Time To Go Back To 500 Miles
By
Advertisment

NASCAR’s Delaware 400 was the 25th race run at the 400 mile distance in Dover’s history, and it was yet another Jimmie Johnson runaway. The racing had perked up dramatically the last few seasons with some memorable combat up front in 2006 and also 2008 and the spectacle of several three-wide laps for the lead between the Roush Fords. We also had the spectacle of Joey Logano’s tumble in Turn Three – it is amazing the cars don’t flip over more often given that the speeds are absurdly high for the track’s size and configuration.

The race, though, was ultimately forgettable, and one reason why has gone unnoticed. Dover used to run 500 mile races, then in 1997 NASCAR raised the sanction fee for a 500 mile race, basically strong-arming Dennis McGlynn into shortening his track’s races.

The results, after 13 seasons and 25 races, cannot be said to have vindicated shorter distances. Nowhere in the thirteen seasons Dover has run 400 milers have we seen any improvement in competitive depth or any noticable shifts in momentum during the race. Indeed, what has stood out with Dover at 400 miles is how predictable the races have become.

Certainly the excessive technologization of the sport has a lot to do with it and the points-racing mentality of the sport has a lot to do with it, but in the end what we have is that 400 miles simply is not better racing than 500. Making it more insulting to McGlynn and his group is the number of new tracks that have come into the sport starting in 1997 that run 500-mile races. Texas and Fontana debuted in 1997 with 500 milers and the length of these races is not a problem.

Nor was it a problem with Dover. People would complain about five-hour races, but what was always missing from such missives is that Dover’s marathons were usually more compelling than shorter races. The last two 500s at Dover illustrated this – the 1996 Delaware 500 was a surprisingly hard-fought affair with a lot of attrition. The 1997 Mason-Dixon 500 saw three leaders crash out in the extra 100 miles, handing the win over to a surprise contender (Ricky Rudd).

The 500 issue is pertinent to several tracks, notably Pocono, where 500 has been criticized in the media over the years yet has proven to be a superior test of machinery and driving than 400 miles. Indeed, Pocono has in its favor the Brickyard 400, run between its two dates and which has never displayed a memorable competition borne of its shorter distance. The Brickyard year after year has been a huge competitive letdown, whereas Pocono with its longer races has seen spots of good racing, especially the five-abreast combat that happened at Pocono following this past season’s sub-mediocre Brickyard 400.

The reality is that Dover was a better race at 500 miles than 400. Complaints about the distance need to be muzzled and competitors need to man up and take on the better challenge of a 500-mile race compared to a 400-miler. With this past Dover, there might have been a different winner with an extra 100 miles.

————-

Views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Catchfence



Article Tags: , ,


8 Responses to “ It’s Time To Go Back To 500 Miles ”
  1. Paul Jensen says:

    NASCAR needs LESS 500 mile races, not more.  21st century fans do not want to sit there for five or more hours watching a race go on and on.  500 mile races need to go the way of baseball doubleheaders.  TV requires a nicely packaged three-hour package, and Cup racing does not deliver that, thus the declining ratings.  Note the Truck races are shorter and their ratings continue to climb.

    • Michael Daly says:

      Sorry, but you’re wrong on all particulars. 21st century fans aren’t the ADD crowd you think they are; they will accept five-hour races. TV doesn’t require three-hour packages – on the contrary they get more bang for their rights fees from four-plus hour telecasts. Winston Cup’s ratings are declining because we don’t see 40-plus lead changes per race anymore and we don’t see that much in the way of new winning drivers and teams; we’ve seen some new winners this year but overall it’s not as much as was the case in the 1980s and 1990s. And the Truck Series ratings are “climbing” from the cellar to one step above the cellar, and that series is in far more serious economic and competitive decline than Winston Cup – those alleged boosts in ratings are not translating to anything.

      The fact is 500 miles is a superior test of machinery and racer than shorter distances.

  2. Paul Jensen says:

    Your comments are complete nonsense.  Any TV executive will tell you three hours is the ideal length for a live sporting event.  People are napping during the races because they are way too long.  Nobody cares about test of machinery.  It’s entertainment.

    • Michael Daly says:

      Paul, I’m sorry, but you’re still wrong. What TV executives have said with regard to racing is that 500 milers pay them back what they invested in rights fees more than shorter races. “People are napping because the races are way too long.” They’re turning off the shorter races more, because they’re not competitive. “Nobody cares about test of machinery.” They care about competition, and 500 miles makes for better competition because it is a better test of machinery and racer.

  3. Thanks for providing me with our next Poll. Guess we shall see what the fans think. The poll has also been asked on the http://www.facebook.com/Catchfence fan page, and so far, no one wants any 500 mile race shortened. A lot of exclamation points are following NO; as well as, agreeing with the writer to make them ALL 500 miles.
  4. Paul Jensen says:

    I am not wrong.  I have an opinion very different than you.


Post a Comment


© 2011-2012 Catchfence. All rights reserved.

Catchfence.com is a member of the Citizen Journalist Media Corps created by NASCAR®.
NASCAR® is a registered trademark owned by National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
The Official NASCAR® website is NASCAR® ONLINE(sm) at www.nascar.com